-
(Source: imgfave, via prince-winter)
(Source: imgfave, via prince-winter)
-
ah…
(Source: sillybitches, via callmeh0pelessn0tr0mantic)
ah…
(Source: sillybitches, via callmeh0pelessn0tr0mantic)
-
la storia della mia vita
(Source: theduty)
la storia della mia vita
(Source: theduty)
-
Ovvio!
(Source: bens-druck-steigt, via prince-winter)
Ovvio!
(Source: bens-druck-steigt, via prince-winter)
-
-
-
October 17th
A week ago the world went wild over CERN’s tentative claim that it could make neutrinos travel faster than light. Suddenly, intergalactic tourism and day trips to the real Jurassic Park were back on the menu, despite everything Einstein said. Now, however, a team of scientists at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands reckons it’s come up with a more plausible (and disappointing) explanation of what happened: the GPS satellites used to measure the departure and arrival times of the racing neutrinos were themselves subject to Einsteinian effects, because they were in motion relative to the experiment. This relative motion wasn’t properly taken into account, but it would have decreased the neutrinos’ apparent journey time. The Dutch scientists calculated the error and came up with the 64 nanoseconds. Sound familiar? That’s because it’s almost exactly the margin by which CERN’s neutrinos were supposed to have beaten light. So, it’s Monday morning, Alpha Centauri and medieval jousting tournaments remain as out of reach as ever, and we just thought we’d let you know. (via Remember those faster-than-light neutrinos? Great, now forget ‘em — Engadget)
A week ago the world went wild over CERN’s tentative claim that it could make neutrinos travel faster than light. Suddenly, intergalactic tourism and day trips to the real Jurassic Park were back on the menu, despite everything Einstein said. Now, however, a team of scientists at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands reckons it’s come up with a more plausible (and disappointing) explanation of what happened: the GPS satellites used to measure the departure and arrival times of the racing neutrinos were themselves subject to Einsteinian effects, because they were in motion relative to the experiment. This relative motion wasn’t properly taken into account, but it would have decreased the neutrinos’ apparent journey time. The Dutch scientists calculated the error and came up with the 64 nanoseconds. Sound familiar? That’s because it’s almost exactly the margin by which CERN’s neutrinos were supposed to have beaten light. So, it’s Monday morning, Alpha Centauri and medieval jousting tournaments remain as out of reach as ever, and we just thought we’d let you know. (via Remember those faster-than-light neutrinos? Great, now forget ‘em — Engadget)
A week ago the world went wild over CERN’s tentative claim that it could make neutrinos travel faster than light. Suddenly, intergalactic tourism and day trips to the real Jurassic Park were back on the menu, despite everything Einstein said. Now, however, a team of scientists at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands reckons it’s come up with a more plausible (and disappointing) explanation of what happened: the GPS satellites used to measure the departure and arrival times of the racing neutrinos were themselves subject to Einsteinian effects, because they were in motion relative to the experiment. This relative motion wasn’t properly taken into account, but it would have decreased the neutrinos’ apparent journey time. The Dutch scientists calculated the error and came up with the 64 nanoseconds. Sound familiar? That’s because it’s almost exactly the margin by which CERN’s neutrinos were supposed to have beaten light. So, it’s Monday morning, Alpha Centauri and medieval jousting tournaments remain as out of reach as ever, and we just thought we’d let you know. (via Remember those faster-than-light neutrinos? Great, now forget ‘em — Engadget)
-
-
September 30th
Vuoi sapere se tuo figlio è gay? C’è un app.
Invece per scoprire l’idiozia umana i mezzi non sono mai abbastanza.
Vuoi sapere se tuo figlio è gay? C’è un app.
Invece per scoprire l’idiozia umana i mezzi non sono mai abbastanza.
Vuoi sapere se tuo figlio è gay? C’è un app.
Invece per scoprire l’idiozia umana i mezzi non sono mai abbastanza.
-
-
-
"
225 days under grass
and you know more than I.
they have long taken your blood,
you are a dry stick in a basket.
is this how it works?
in this room
the hours of love
still make shadows.when you left
you took almost
everything.
I kneel in the nights
before tigers
that will not let me be.what you were
will not happen again.
the tigers have found me
and I do not care.- “For Jane” by Charles Bukowski
"(via lifeandpearls)
